Regulations

TR CU 008/2011 on toy safety

Use TR CU 008/2011 to assess whether a product is a toy, which risks apply and whether certification requirements must be checked.

TR CU 008/2011 is a technical regulation on toy safety. It applies to a product assessment based on intended play, target age, design, materials, included parts, and any power sources or chemicals. The practical route is to identify the product, check whether it falls within the regulation's toy definition, review exclusions, determine the relevant risks, and check the applicable certification requirements.

What TR CU 008/2011 covers

TR CU 008/2011 covers toy safety. The product's intended play is the starting point because a label alone does not establish whether the regulation applies. The assessment should connect the product's function with its design, materials, included parts, target age, and any power or chemical features.

A product description should therefore explain what the product is intended to do during play. The description should also identify who is expected to use it and which components are supplied with it. These inputs help define the product before its safety risks and certification requirements are reviewed.

Product information needed for the assessment

The assessment begins with a defined product record. The record should contain the following information.

  • Intended play describes the activity for which the product is designed.
  • Target age identifies the intended age group.
  • Design identifies the form and operating features of the product.
  • Materials identify what the product is made from.
  • Included parts identify every component supplied with the product.
  • Power identifies whether the product uses a power source.
  • Chemicals identify whether the product contains or uses chemical substances.

Each input can change the risk review. A product with powered parts requires a different question from a product with no power source. A product with chemical features requires a different question from a product made without them. The assessment must follow the actual product configuration rather than a general product label.

How to decide whether the product is a toy

The toy definition under TR CU 008/2011 must be checked before deciding which requirements apply. Intended play is a key part of that decision. The product's name, marketing label, or commercial category does not by itself resolve the classification.

The regulation also has exclusions. An exclusion must be checked against the product itself and the relevant wording of TR CU 008/2011. A supplier should not treat a product as outside the regulation merely because it is described as a collector's item or sports equipment.

A collector's label does not automatically establish that a product is excluded. A sports label does not automatically establish that a product is excluded. The product's intended use, design, age profile, materials, parts, and other relevant features still need to be considered.

Risk areas for toys

The risk review depends on the product. TR CU 008/2011 may require consideration of mechanical, chemical, electrical, or flammability issues, depending on the toy's features.

Product inputRisk question
Design and included partsCould the design or a supplied part create a mechanical safety issue?
Materials and chemicalsCould the materials or chemical features create a chemical safety issue?
Power sourceCould the powered feature create an electrical safety issue?
Materials and constructionCould the product create a flammability issue?

This table is a decision framework, not a conclusion about a particular product. The product features determine which risk questions are relevant. A toy may require one risk review or several risk reviews.

Why the target age matters

The target age is an assessment input. It connects the product with its intended users and helps define the safety review. The target age should be considered together with intended play, design, materials, and included parts.

An age warning does not replace the assessment. A warning may communicate an age-related limitation, but it does not remove the need to review the product's risks. The supplier must still consider the product's mechanical, chemical, electrical, or flammability features where those features are relevant.

The decision is therefore not “warning or assessment”. The decision is whether the product information supports the required safety review and whether the warning is considered as part of that review.

Certification requirements

Certification requirements must be checked after the product's status and risk features have been considered. TR CU 008/2011 contains certification requirements for toys. The applicable requirement cannot be selected safely from the product name alone.

The certification check should use the defined product record. The record should connect the intended play, target age, design, materials, included parts, power features, and chemical features with the regulation's toy definition and exclusions.

Where the product is treated as a toy, the supplier should check the certification requirement under TR CU 008/2011. Where the supplier considers an exclusion, the supplier should check that exclusion against the product's actual features rather than relying on a label such as “collector's item” or “sports equipment”.

Practical sequence for an overseas supplier

  1. Describe the product. Record intended play, target age, design, materials, included parts, power, and chemicals.
  2. Check the definition. Compare the product with the toy definition in TR CU 008/2011.
  3. Check exclusions. Review the regulation's exclusions against the product's actual use and design.
  4. Map the risks. Consider mechanical, chemical, electrical, and flammability issues where the product features make them relevant.
  5. Review the age information. Treat age warnings as part of the information, not as a substitute for assessment.
  6. Check certification. Identify the certification requirement that applies to the product's status and features.

This sequence produces a reasoned product decision. It does not treat every toy as having the same risk profile, and it does not treat every labelled exclusion as established.

Evidence to retain for the decision

The core evidence is the product information used in the assessment. It should show the intended play, target age, design, materials, included parts, power features, and chemical features. It should also record how the toy definition, exclusions, risk areas, age information, and certification requirements were considered.

Common decision errors

  • Using the label as the classification. A product name does not replace the check of intended play and the toy definition.
  • Assuming an exclusion. A collector's or sports label does not, by itself, establish that the product is excluded.
  • Relying on an age warning. An age warning does not replace the safety assessment.
  • Checking only one risk. The relevant risk may be mechanical, chemical, electrical, flammability-related, or more than one of these.
  • Ignoring supplied parts. Included parts form part of the product information and may affect the risk review.

Frequently asked questions

What is the first step under TR CU 008/2011?

The first step is to define the product by recording intended play, target age, design, materials, included parts, and any power or chemical features.

Does an age warning replace a toy safety assessment?

No. An age warning does not substitute for assessment. The product's design, materials, included parts, and relevant mechanical, chemical, electrical, or flammability risks must still be considered.

Are collector's items automatically excluded?

No. A collector's label does not automatically establish an exclusion. The product's intended use and actual features must be checked against the exclusions in TR CU 008/2011.

Are sports products automatically outside TR CU 008/2011?

No. A sports label does not automatically establish that a product is excluded. The supplier must check the product's intended use, design, materials, included parts, and the regulation's exclusions.

TR CU 008/2011 should be applied through a documented product-specific review of classification, exclusions, risks, and certification requirements.

Identify the toy and the certification result

Article 2 defines toys by intended play use for children under 14. Check the exclusions in the current text as part of classification. Article 6 requires certification before a covered toy is placed on the market. Give the accredited certification body the model and age group, product specification, materials, warnings and evidence for the configuration that will be sold.

Compare the certificate and declaration routes and check what evidence applies to your product.

Related requirements and services

Sources

  1. TR CU 008/2011 on the EEC website
  2. Consolidated text of TR CU 008/2011

Related pages

Related pages

D-04

TR CU 021/2011 on food safety

Find the EAEU food safety route under TR CU 021/2011, including declarations, product state registration, veterinary examination and the evidence to.

View details

Free compliance check

Send your product details. We will tell you which documents apply, who should be the applicant and what testing is needed.

Required fields are marked with *